Nearmint's Vintage Football Card Blog » Gaynell Tinsley

1955 Topps All-American Whizzer White and Gaynell Tinsley Error Cards

nearmint — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:24:16 +0000

There are two cards on eBay this week that I seldom see for sale: a 1955 Topps All-American Whizzer White card with Gaynell Tinsley’s bio, and a Gaynell Tinsley card with Whizzer White’s bio. Both were graded 8, or NM/MT, by PSA. It apparently didn’t take Topps long to correct their error in 1955, because these two cards are much scarcer than the corrected versions. The back of each error card is shown here. Clicking on an image will take you to eBay and show you the front, as well.

Years ago, when I first read about these errors, I assumed that the backs of the cards were swapped in their entirety. Wrong-back cards are fairly common; you can see a few of them on my 1960 Fleer virtual uncut sheet page. It was only recently that I learned that only the bio sections of the White and Tinsley cards are swapped. This is why the descriptions in the price guides say Gaynell Tinsley (Whizzer White bio) and Whizzer White (Gaynell Tinsley bio). Duh.

I have always thought that the corrected Whizzer White card was undervalued, considering that it is his rookie card, and that he served as a U.S. Supreme Court justice for 31 years after his football career. White’s card sells for only about double the price of a common in the 1955 All-American set, and the price guides put it at two or three times the price of a common. His error card sells for much more, but that is because of its scarcity, not his fame.

For more on the 1955 Topps All-American set, see A is for All-Americans.

Don’t Know Much About Wrong-Back Cards

nearmint — Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:00:09 +0000

My friend Chas sent me this scan today; it’s a 1955 Bowman Harlon Hill card with an inverted Chet Ostrowski back. Chas asked if I knew anything about the card–scarcity, value, etc.–and I had to admit that I didn’t. Maybe someone here can chime in and tell us more.

Wrong-backed cards aren’t unusual: there are always a bunch on eBay, both vintage and modern. I’ve accumulated a few myself, in the course of buying lots for my 1960 Fleer set. My wrong-backs are listed on my 1960 Fleer virtual uncut sheet page, and I posted some scans there, too. As on Chas’s card, the backs on my wrong-backs are all inverted. My theory is that a plate was installed upside down in the printing press, but I know zilch about printing, so I don’t even know if that makes sense.

The hobby appears to consider wrong-back cards printing flaws, rather than error cards, so they’re not included in set checklists, and they’re collectible mostly as curiosities. I can think of one exception: the Gaynell Tinsley and Whizzer White cards in the 1955 Topps All-American set can each be found with the back of the other, and they are considered error cards. I assume that the backs of those two cards were switched on the uncut sheets, whereas other wrong-backs were caused by mishaps in the printing process, not the configuration of the sheets.

If you know more about wrong-backs, or if you have one to share, post a comment!

E is for Error Cards

nearmint — Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:12:29 +0000

Errors on vintage football cards are common, presumably because the card companies intended the cards for kids, and they did not worry much about quality control. The errors range from incorrect player positions and statistics to reversed images and cards that picture the wrong player.

The most common error on vintage cards is probably misspelling of the player’s name. Pictured here is one example, Brian Piccolo’s 1969 Topps rookie card, which has his name misspelled Bryon on the front and Bryan on the back. Some players’ names were especially problematic: Sonny Jurgensen‘s name is misspelled on at least two cards, and so is Woodley Lewis‘s. Philadelphia Gum misspelled Herb Adderley’s name four years in a row, and Topps also misspelled it once. (How about Bob Hoernschemeyer, you ask? Well, guess what, Bowman got that one right every time!)

People sometimes ask me if error cards are valuable. The answer: usually not. Most errors were not corrected in production, so the error cards are no scarcer than the other cards in the set. (Price guides refer to these as uncorrected errors, abbreviated UER.) If a card company did correct an error in production, one version or the other–the error or the corrected card–can be much scarcer than the other cards in the set, and hence more valuable. Two examples come to mind: First, in the 1955 Topps All-American set, some of Byron White‘s cards were printed with Gaynell Tinsley‘s bio on the back, and some of Tinsley’s were printed with White’s. Topps corrected these errors after production began, and the incorrect versions are scarcer and more valuable than the corrected ones. Second, in the 1957 Topps set, some copies of Will Sherman‘s card have white space where “RAMS” was supposed to go. Topps also corrected this error in production, and the “No Rams” version is scarcer and more valuable than the corrected version.

In regard to pricing, then, the error and corrected versions of a card are really just considered variations of the card. When a card has two variations, some collectors will desire both, and the scarcer one is generally worth more. It’s the same with errors and corrected cards.

Occasionally people send me scans of what they think are error cards, but what they actually have are cards with printing or processing problems: off-centering, double images, print marks, etc. These production flaws are not considered errors, and in most cases they hurt the value of the card. If a production flaw is particularly bad–say the card is miscut so badly that it includes part of the next card–a collector might pay a bit for the novelty, but usually the card will be worth far less than a card without the flaw.

Also, now and then someone will list a card on eBay that has been mislabeled by a grading company, claiming that it is a valuable error. It’s not. At least one grading company makes these so-called “mechanical errors” frequently, and the errors are just a nuisance to get corrected.

As I wrote a while back, the Advanced Search page in the Vintage Football Card Gallery supports searches for error cards. I have most of the major errors identified in the Gallery, and I am gradually adding the minor ones.